Asian Annals
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Wickii T Vigneswaran
Francis J Podbielski
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vigneswaran, W. T
Right arrow Articles by Podbielski, F. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vigneswaran, W. T
Right arrow Articles by Podbielski, F. J
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2003;11:48-51
© 2003 Asia Publishing EXchange Ltd


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Cardiac Morphology in Lung Volume Reduction Surgery for Endstage Emphysema

Wickii T Vigneswaran, MD, Eva V Chomka, MD, Vladmir Jelnin, MD, M Janeen Hernan, MSN, Francis J Podbielski, MD

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The University of Illinois at Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA

For reprint information contact: Wickii T Vigneswaran, MD Tel: 1 708 327 2488 Fax: 1 708 327 2382 email: wvignes{at}lumc.edu Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153 USA.

Lung volume reduction surgery for endstage emphysema produces significant improvements in various pulmonary parameters, but its effects on cardiac morphology and function have not been clearly defined. Ten patients scheduled for lung volume reduction surgery underwent pulmonary function testing, right-heart catheterization, and electron beam computed tomography of the heart. These studies were repeated 12–16 weeks after the procedure. Quantitative assessments of right and left ventricular function and left ventricular muscle mass were obtained. Postoperatively, all patients showed significant improvements in forced expiratory volume at one minute compared to the preoperative value (1.57 ± 0.24 L versus 1.10 ± 0.21 L), predicted residual lung volume (115% ± 15% versus 205% ± 15%), and 6-minute walk test (318 ± 17 m versus 267 ± 24 m). There were no significant differences between postoperative and preoperative right ventricular end-diastolic volumes (167.3 ± 21.2 mL versus 169.2 ± 17.3 mL) or left ventricular end-diastolic volumes (112.5 ± 10.2 mL versus 119.2 ± 9.7 mL).







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by SAGE Publications