HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Abdel Aziz, T. A Articles by Roberts, D. G Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Abdel Aziz, T. A Articles by Roberts, D. G

Antegrade-Retrograde Cardioplegia for Myocardial Protection During Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Dubai Hospital Dubai, United Arab Emirates 1 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Ain Shams University Cairo, Egypt

For reprint information contact: Najib Al Khaja, MD, PhD Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Dubai Hospital P.O. Box 7272 Dubai, United Arab Emirates Tel: 971 4 71 4444 Fax: 971 4 71 9340

This prospective randomized clinical study was designed to assess and compare the use of combined antegrade-retrograde cardioplegia versus antegrade cardioplegia in providing adequate myocardial preservation during coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Fifty patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly divided into 2 groups according to the route of cardioplegic delivery: group A (25 patients) received antegrade cold crystalloid cardioplegia; group B (25 patients) received combined antegrade-retrograde cold crystalloid cardioplegia. The groups were compared by clinical and electrocardiographic criteria and biochemical markers of ischemic myocardial damage. There was a highly significant statistical difference between the groups in terms of spontaneous recovery of sinus rhythm (40% of patients in group A versus 96% in group B). The use of direct current shock to restore sinus rhythm was higher in group A (60%) compared with group B (4%). Low cardiac output occurred in 20% of patients in group A and in 16% of patients in group B but this difference was not statistically significant. No bundle-branch block was found in group B whereas the incidence was 8% in group A. Significantly higher levels of biochemical markers of myocardial damage were obtained in group A at 10 minutes, 4 hours, and 12 hours after declamping. These results indicate that combined antegrade-retrograde cardioplegia is superior to antegrade cardioplegia for myocardial protection during coronary artery bypass graft surgery.