Asian Annals Click here to go to Maquet website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Probal Ghosh
Narendra Bhonsle
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bhonsle, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bhonsle, N.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 1999;7:190-194
© 1999 Asia Publishing EXchange Pte Ltd


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION

Inaccuracy of Prediction of Mitral Valve Prosthesis Size

Probal Ghosh, FRCS, FETCS, Narendra Bhonsle, MS

Department of Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery
Sanjay Gandhi Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences
Lucknow, India
For reprint information contact: Probal Ghosh, FRCS, FETCS Tel: 972 3 964 7843 Fax: 972 7 640 9966 email: probalg{at}hotmail.com Harav Zinger 8, Rishon Le Zion 75255, Israel.
Several formulae related to body surface area have been proposed to predict normal mitral annular size. This study examined the applicability of such formulae in predicting the size of mitral valve prostheses. Developmental criteria and echocardiographic parameters were used retrospectively to determine mitral annular size in 92 consecutive patients undergoing mitral valve replacement. Discrepancies were noted among the different predicted annular diameters. Moreover, predicted diameters differed from the diameters of the implanted prostheses. These differences were not influenced by type of prosthesis, type of lesion, technique of surgery, or sex of the patient. A greater degree of disparity was noted for larger body surface areas with all prediction formulae. However, valve size index and valve area index remained incremental with increasing prosthesis size. It was concluded that prediction formulae for mitral annular size based on body surface area do not help the surgeon to predetermine the size of mitral valve prosthesis that may be implanted at operation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 by the Asia Publishing EXchange Ltd.