Asian Annals Activate Your Online Account to Asian Annals
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Kit V Arom
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arom, K. V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Arom, K. V
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - transplantation
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2001;9:1-2
© 2001 Asia Publishing EXchange Pte Ltd


EDITORIAL

A Flight from Minneapolis to Munich

Kit V Arom, MD, PhD

The John Nasseff Heart Hospital Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Initial efforts in minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery were often met with skepticism and hesitation from the medical community, yet there was a great deal of patient support and persistence from those pursuing the field. The idea of minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery rapidly spread to other components of the cardiovascular surgical field.

Because minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) requires enabling technology, the medical industry and device companies readily participated in the development of equipment to improve the performance of MICS. The excitement generated by the rapid introduction of new techniques and technology, cost benefit of eliminating cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with significant comorbid risk factors, and the decrease in tissue trauma of minimally invasive surgery even with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, generated the scheduling of multiple international meetings. These meetings, often supported by funds contributed by the medical industry, were unsupervised and the core curriculum was not audited. Additionally, individual companies held their own symposia in an effort to popularize devices as well as market their own products. Data were scarce and prospective trials relating to the scientific evaluation of the minimally invasive processes were limited, casting pallor over the development of MICS.

In June 1996, Robert W Emery and colleagues in Minnesota organized the first meeting on MICS in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. There was a high . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by SAGE Publications