|
|
||||||||
CASE STUDY |
| Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston, South Carolina, USA |
|
Feza Nurozler, MD Tel: 90 533 332 3088 Fax: 90 322 458 5451 email: feza_n{at}hotmail.com Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ortadog u Hospital, Ziyapa a Mah. 51. Sok No. 1, Seyhan, Adana 01140, Turkey.
|
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| CASE REPORTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CASE 2
A patient with a primum atrial septal defect, mitral and tricuspid insufficiency, and pulmonary stenosis underwent repair at 7 years of age. A Hancock valved Dacron conduit (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) was placed between the right ventricle and pulmonary arteries because of the tricuspid insufficiency. Obstruction of the Dacron conduit developed 5 years later, so the conduit was removed, right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery continuity was reestablished, and a 21-mm SJM valve was placed in the pulmonary position. The patient was maintained without anticoagulation for 9 years before starting warfarin treatment. The SJM valve has remained functional during 17 years of follow-up.
CASE 3
A 3-year-old patient with tetralogy of Fallot underwent primary repair including placement of an autologous pericardial transannular patch. Five years later, PVR was carried out with a 23-mm SJM valve because of RV failure and pulmonary insufficiency. The patient was maintained without anticoagulation but developed thrombosis and underwent thrombolytic treatment 8 months later. Warfarin therapy was started after thrombolysis. There has been no recurrence of thrombosis in 14 years of follow-up.
CASE 4
A 14-year-old patient with tetralogy of Fallot and no previous palliation, underwent primary repair including placement of a transannular autologous pericardial patch. Three years later, aneurysmal dilatation of the RV outflow tract developed and PVR was carried out with a 23-mm SJM valve. No anticoagulant was given in the first 6 years, then warfarin was started. However, the patient was noncompliant with the anticoagulation and subsequently suffered 3 episodes of valve thrombosis and one pulmonary embolism; the first episode was 9 years after PVR. Following 2 successful thrombolytic treat-ments, the patient underwent reoperation after the 3rd episode, and the SJM valve was replaced with a pulmonary homograft. Intraoperatively, extensive pannus was found around the valve, with a partially immobilizing thrombus on the leaflets. The patient has been doing well without any thromboembolic complication for 14 years after the homograft replacement.
CASE 5
A patient with tetralogy of Fallot and pulmonary atresia underwent palliative RV outflow tract reconstruction with an autologous pericardial patch, in the neonatal period. Ventricular septal defect closure and PVR with a 19-mm SJM valve prosthesis was performed at the age of 20 months, and the patient was maintained without anticoagulation. Thrombosis developed 2.5 years later and the SJM valve was replaced with a CarpentierEdwards bioprosthesis (Baxter Healthcare Corp., Santa Ana, CA, USA). Intraoperatively, there was a small amount of thrombotic material on the hinge points of the valve. The patient was followed up for 2.5 years, but has not been in contact for the last 3 years.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thrombosis of mechanical valves (MVs) in the pulmonary position usually progresses slowly. Because pulmonary insufficiency or pulmonary stenosis caused by MV dysfunction is usually well tolerated compared to left-sided valve thrombosis, many patients are asymp-tomatic.24 The higher incidence of thrombosis of SJM valve prostheses in the pulmonary position compared to those on the left side, suggests a difference in coagulation conditions. This may be due to variations in the pressure difference and turbulent flow to which a sewing collar and adjacent endocardium are exposed. Two approaches can be applied in the management of thrombosed MVs in the pulmonary position: thrombolytic treatment or surgical removal. Successful thrombolysis has been demonstrated in patients with MV thrombosis when there is no accompanying pannus formation.4,6,7 Avoidance of the risks of reoperation is the major advantage of thrombolytic treatment, but it has its own risks and limitations. These include bleeding, embolization, and need for subsequent anticoagulation to guard against rethrombosis. Moreover, thrombolysis fails in 15% to 30% of cases, usually due to obstruction of the valve by pannus rather than thrombus. An analysis of 26 cases of thrombolysis for thrombosed right-sided MVs reported over the last decade has revealed a primary success rate of approximately 70% and an early rethrombosis rate of 10%.8 Rethrombosis after thrombolysis is related to the duration of thrombosis and the presence of concomitant fibrous tissue on the valve. One of our patients did well after thrombolysis whereas another needed redo PVR after 2 successful thrombolytic treatments. No bleeding or embolization occurred at the time of thrombolysis. Replacement of a thrombosed MV with a homograft or a bioprosthetic valve is another option with low operative risk, good long-term results, and freedom from anticoagu-lation. Both of our patients did well after homograft replacement, without a thromboembolic event. An alterna-tive approach, given large central and branch pulmonary arteries and low pulmonary vascular resistance, is removal of the MV without replacement.
Similar to previous reports, our data show a high risk of thrombosis and need for anticoagulation, although the SJM valve in the pulmonary position may occasionally function long-term without anticoagulation. These cases also indicate that fibrinolytic treatment may be reasonable for a first thrombotic episode. However, the surgical approach which is effective with low operative risk, good long-term results, and freedom from anticoagulation is advisable in patients who develop recurrent thrombosis.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Fritzsche, T. Eitz, A. Laczkovics, A. Liebold, M. Knaut, K. Matschke, A. Sagie, U. Mehlhorn, D. Horstkotte, and R. Koerfer Early Detection of Mechanical Valve Dysfunction Using a New Home Monitoring Device Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 83(2): 542 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Waterbolk, E. S. Hoendermis, I. J. den Hamer, and T. Ebels Pulmonary valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis. Promising results of 28 procedures in patients with congenital heart disease. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 30(1): 28 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Haas, C. Schreiber, J. Horer, M. Kostolny, K. Holper, and R. Lange Is There a Role for Mechanical Valved Conduits in the Pulmonary Position? Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 79(5): 1662 - 1667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Erek, Y. Kenan Yalcinbas, A. Sarioglu, and T. Sarioglu Double root re-replacement after Ross-Konno operation in a patient with straight back syndrome: clamshell approach Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2004; 3(4): 575 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Kanter, D. A. Fyfe, W. T. Mahle, J. M. Forbess, and P. M. Kirshbom Results with the freestyle porcine aortic root for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction in children Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 76(6): 1889 - 1895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |