Asian Annals
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Juan C Chachques
Paul Lajos
Alain Carpentier
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chachques, J. C
Right arrow Articles by Carpentier, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chachques, J. C
Right arrow Articles by Carpentier, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Education
Right arrow Coronary disease
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2005;13:287-296
© 2005 Asia Publishing EXchange Ltd


REVIEW PAPER

Cellular Cardiomyoplasty for Myocardial Regeneration

Juan C Chachques, MD, Corinne Salanson-Lajos, MD, Paul Lajos, MD, Abdel Shafy, MD, Adel Alshamry, MD, Alain Carpentier, MD

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, Paris, France

For reprint information contact: Juan C Chachques, MD, Tel: 33 1 4395 9359, Fax: 33 1 4072 8608, Email: j.chachques{at}brs.ap-hop-paris.fr, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Pompidou Hospital, 20 rue Leblanc, Paris 75015, France.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 IMPACT OF HEART FAILURE
 VENTRICULAR REMODELING
 CELL THERAPY
 INDICATIONS AND INCLUSION...
 TECHNIQUES FOR CELL INJECTION
 CLINICAL TRIALS
 NEW DEVELOPMENTS
 CONCLUSION
 FUTURE PROSPECTS
 REFERENCES
 
The evolving challenge of managing patients with congestive heart failure is the need to develop new therapeutic strategies. The cellular, molecular, and genetic approaches investigated aim to reinforce the weak, failing heart muscle while restoring its functional potential. This approach is principally cellular therapy (i.e. cellular cardiomyoplasty), the preferred therapeutic choice because of its clinical applicability and regenerative capacity. Different stem cells: bone marrow cells, skeletal and smooth muscle cells, vascular endothelial cells, mesothelial cells, adipose tissue stroma cells, dental stem cells, and embryonic and fetal cells, have been proposed for regenerative medicine and biology. Stem cell mobilization with G-CSF cytokine was also proposed as a single therapy for myocardial infarction. We investigated the association of cell therapy with electrostimulation (dynamic cellular cardiomyoplasty), the use of autologous human serum for cell cultures, and a new catheter for simultaneous infarct detection and cell delivery. Our team conducted cell-based myogenic and angiogenic clinical trials for chronic ischemic heart disease. Cellular cardiomyoplasty constitutes a new approach for myocardial regeneration; the ultimate goal is to avoid the progression of ventricular remodeling and heart failure for patients presenting with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies.


    IMPACT OF HEART FAILURE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 IMPACT OF HEART FAILURE
 VENTRICULAR REMODELING
 CELL THERAPY
 INDICATIONS AND INCLUSION...
 TECHNIQUES FOR CELL INJECTION
 CLINICAL TRIALS
 NEW DEVELOPMENTS
 CONCLUSION
 FUTURE PROSPECTS
 REFERENCES
 
Over the past few years, a growing number of research teams have examined the follow-up of congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. Medical treatment (particularly ACE inhibitors combined with beta-blockers and selective aldosterone blockers), as well as electrophysiological procedures (multisite pacing for atrial-biventricular resynchronization and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators) have proven to be effective, improving patients’ prognosis. However, these treatments remain palliative, and the cardiac muscle continues to deteriorate in many cardiovascular diseases. Neurohormonal activation plays an important role in the progression of cardiac insufficiency. Therefore, neurohormonal inhibition is becoming the target objective in emerging heart failure treatments.

Cardiac transplantation remains the only curative treatment for CHF, but has remained limited in its application due to a shortage of donated organs, age of recipients, and other strict selection criteria. Non-beating heart donors represent a new alternative to palliate the reduced number of transplantation procedures. Implantable cardiac assist devices are still evolving, and xenotransplantation is in the early research phase with no clinical applications to date.

The epidemiology of CHF is well known due to its dramatic economic impact on health care systems. In France, approximately 600,000 patients have CHF with 150,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Mean age at onset is 73.5 years, and 2/3 of the patients are aged 70 years and older. Annually, about 3,500,000 outpatient visits and 150,000 hospitalizations are related to congestive heart failure. CHF is responsible for more than 32,000 annual deaths. CHF costs represent more than 1% of the total annual medical costs and represent a major and growing public health burden. This should encourage us to optimize the medical treatment and prevention of CHF.

In the US, congestive heart failure affects almost 5 million people, mostly elderly. Significant therapeutic advances in CHF management have resulted in striking declines in mortality rates, but hospitalization is ever increasing, now at more than 1 million hospitalizations annually with a cost greater than $15 billion. One of the most important and challenging factors facing case managers who work with the CHF population is how to minimize treatment costs while enhancing clinical outcomes.


    VENTRICULAR REMODELING
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 IMPACT OF HEART FAILURE
 VENTRICULAR REMODELING
 CELL THERAPY
 INDICATIONS AND INCLUSION...
 TECHNIQUES FOR CELL INJECTION
 CLINICAL TRIALS
 NEW DEVELOPMENTS
 CONCLUSION
 FUTURE PROSPECTS
 REFERENCES
 
The macroscopic basis for congestive heart failure is defined as conversion of a helical heart, whereby the apical loop fibre angle orientation that produces a 60% ejection fraction becomes more transverse to develop a spherical configuration. The geometric consequence is flattening of the apical loop architecture, so that the 15% shortening can produce only 30% ejection fraction. These fundamental architectural changes are then used to evolve new procedures that restore a more normal, helical, ventricular architecture in ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy.1

In chronic ischemic disease, surgical ventricular reconstruction involves resection of postinfarct scar, septal exclusion, cavity reduction by endoventricular patch, and complete coronary grafting. The overall intent is to convert the spherical heart into an elliptical configuration. The published results of the RESTORE Group study confirms that relieving the abnormal tension by excluding the scar and reducing the LV volume allows surgical ventricular reconstruction to improve overall mechanical performance by increasing mechanical efficiency.2

Surgical procedures without ventriculotomy can be indicated in heart failure patients who are refractory to medical therapy. Among these techniques, dynamic cardiomyoplasty, aortomyoplasty counterpulsation, ventricular containment (e.g. Acorn wrap), and the myosplint (Myocor LV shape-change) approaches have been proposed.1 The goal of these procedures is to rebuild a more physiological ventricular shape before irreversible myocardial collagen and fibrosis develop. The many proposed mechanisms of action of latissimus dorsi dynamic cardiomyoplasty are: (1) systolic assist; (2) limitation of ventricular dilation; (3) reduction of ventricular wall stress (sparing effect); and (4) reverse ventricular remodeling due to the active girdling effect. In the literature, long-term survival is equivalent for cardiomyoplasty and heart transplanted patients.1,3

Cell transplantation, growth factors, and gene therapy represent emerging biological treatments in ischemic heart failure conceived to improve myocardial viability.45 Alternatively, non-biological surgical approaches have been proposed such as transmyocardial laser, radiofrequency heating of dyskinetic myocardium, and prosthetic (Marlex and Dacron) patches. These techniques induce myocardial fibrosis with uncertain functional results. A biologic regenerative approach to patients at risk of congestive heart failure seems to be a more effective and physiological approach in preventing infarct expansion, ventricular dilatation, and postischemic remodelling.68


    CELL THERAPY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 IMPACT OF HEART FAILURE
 VENTRICULAR REMODELING
 CELL THERAPY
 INDICATIONS AND INCLUSION...
 TECHNIQUES FOR CELL INJECTION
 CLINICAL TRIALS
 NEW DEVELOPMENTS
 CONCLUSION
 FUTURE PROSPECTS
 REFERENCES
 
Historically, tissue regeneration techniques based on cell transplantation technology have been used for the treatment of hemopathies (chronic lymphocytic leukemia, aplastic anemia, immunodeficiencies, myeloma), in ophthalmology (transplantation of limbal stem cells for corneal regeneration), and in orthopedics (implantation of chondrocytes for articular defects). Current clinical investigations concern the following specialties: endocrinology (transplantation of Langerhans islets in diabetes mellitus), neurology (Huntington’s chorea, Alzheimer and Parkinson’s diseases, spinal cord regeneration), hepatology (implantation of hepatocytes as a bridge to liver transplantation), myology (transplantation of myoblasts in Duchenne’s dystrophy),9 dermatology (implantation of cultured keratinocytes and fibroblasts in burn patients), and vascular surgery (implantation of angiogenic stem cells in critical limb ischemia).

RATIONALE OF CELLULAR CARDIOMYOPLASTY
Cellular cardiomyoplasty (CMP) is a combination of cellular biology with cardiac surgery or with interventional cardiology. It aims to regenerate the myocardium by the transplantation of living cells in order to reduce the fibrosis and the size of the myocardial infarct scar. Cellular CMP consists of intramyocardial cell implantation intended to induce the growth of new muscle fibers (myogenesis) and the development of angiogenesis and vasculogenesis in the damaged myocardium. Cultured autologous cells do not raise immunological, ethical, tumorogenesis, or donor availability problems.1011

CHOICE OF CELLS
Different cell types have been proposed for myocardial regeneration:

The most investigated cells for clinical myocardial repair are skeletal myoblasts and bone marrow cells.

Skeletal Muscle Cells are able to regenerate after injury because of the presence of satellite cells. In postnatal muscle, skeletal muscle precursors (myoblasts) can be derived from satellite cells (reserve cells located on the surface of mature myofibers). When activated by appropriate stimuli, satellite cells proliferate and differentiate into new skeletal muscle fibers. This cell type’s major advantage is that skeletal myoblasts are highly resistant to ischemia and multiply after injury, presenting a high power for multiple mitoses. Differentiated myotubes derived from transplanted skeletal myoblasts have been detected following implantation in a post-infarction lesion.12

The major drawback of using myoblasts is the lack of gap junctions and electromechanical connections between the implanted cells and the host myocardium. Thus, it is uncertain whether an improvement in LV performance could be mediated by increased systolic function caused by synchronous contraction of the graft since skeletal myoblasts are known to not contract spontaneously. Moreover, denervated skeletal myoblasts could progressively become atrophic.13

Gap junctions between grafted myoblasts and host myocardium were not demonstrated. The explanation is the downregulation amongst the myoblasts themselves. When they differentiate into myotubes, they downregulate the mechanical coupling protein (N-cadherine) and the electrical coupling protein (connexine 43); therefore, the transplanted cells remain isolated within the cardiac tissue. However, it is possible that the myotubes might be indirectly connected with the surrounding cardiomyocytes via the extracellular matrix. Analogous to the evolution of the latissimus dorsi muscle in dynamic cardiomyoplasty, when electrostimulation is associated with cell transplantation, grafted myotubes can differentiate into slow muscular fibers resisting fatigue and contracting synchronically with the cardiomyocytes.13

Clinical protocols using myoblasts follow three precise steps: 1) muscular biopsy (10–15 grams) from the thigh vastus lateralis; 2) cell isolation and primary culture over 2 to 3 weeks with a minimum of 300 million cells with at least 70% of myoblasts; 3) re-implantation of the cells in the infarcted area using a surgical or catheter-based approach. Instead of fetal bovine serum, autologous human serum is strongly recommended during the process of cell expansion or eventually in final steps of culturing to avoid surface antigens and subsequent rejection. During cell culture procedures, pre-plating techniques are used to separate non-myogenic cells (e.g. fibroblasts) at the beginning of cell processing. Non-myogenic cells attach to dishes before myoblasts.

Bone Marrow Stem Cells are principally used for the induction of angiogenesis in ischemic diseases. These cells can be obtained from bone marrow aspiration or from peripheral blood. In most cellular CMP protocols, after aspiration of the ilium bone, mononuclear bone marrow cells are selected by Ficoll density separation. This simple cell selection procedure avoids 3 weeks "in vitro" cultures and multiple passage procedures which can attenuate the viability of cells.1415 The major drawback in using these cells is that bone marrow cells can undergo milieu-dependent differentiation. When transplanted in normal myocardium, they may differentiate into cardiocytes. However, when these cells are implanted in a myocardial scar, they may differentiate into fibroblasts, increasing the fibrosis of the postischemic scar.

Experimentally, bone marrow stromal cells can be induced to differentiate into myocytes prior to transplant using a co-culture system with cardiomyocytes or by including 5-azacytidine in the cultures.16 These approaches may be effective in driving myocardial remodeling; however, clinical trials can be compromised in terms of potential cell mutations by azacytidine. In vitro electrostimulation of stem cell cultures is used experimentally by our group for predifferentiation of cells in a myogenic lineage.

There are 4 cell lineages that can be isolated from bone marrow: hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), multipotent adult progenitor cells (MAPC), and progenitor endothelial cells (PEC). The mesenchymal stem cells (also called bone marrow stromal cells) are capable of giving rise to multiple cell lines. There is a new tendency towards the utilization of a given sub-population of bone marrow cells, in particular, the CD 133+ progenitors (cells expressing surface antigen AC133) having a tendency to differentiate into true angioblasts and muscle cells. These cells are rich in hemangioblast progenitors and can be isolated from bone marrow biopsies or from G-CSF (granulocyte-colony stimulating factor) mobilized peripheral blood, using a cell isolation kit including a magnetic separation column (Clinimacs® Cell Selection System, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). This approach avoids in vitro cell culture procedures17 (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Cells for Myocardial Regeneration
 
OTHER CELLS UNDER INVESTIGATION
Embryonic Stem Cells are characterized by their capacity to proliferate in an undifferentiated state for a prolonged period in culture. Afterwards, they can differentiate into every tissue type in the body, forming derivatives of all three germ layers: ecto, meso, and endoderm. For the moment, their clinical application raises immunological barriers and bioethical dilemmas. The difficulties seen with embryonic stem cell transplantation are important. Its thoughts are part of a philosophical and ethical debate open today. Some bioethical laws still favor their use to produce stem cell lineages from embryos from miscarriages and from in vitro fertilization without parental projects and embryos resulting from nuclear transfer from a somatic cell into an oocyte in which the nucleus has been previously removed (therapeutic clonage). Numerous technical problems remain for the harvesting of stem cells such as the poor supply of human oocytes and the difficulty for those cloned cells to reach the blastocyst stage (fifth day of the embryological development). Some studies have shown that these cells differentiate into one unique cell line specific to a particular organ.18 These approaches are at an early experimental stage and future clinical involvement in the field of tissue genesis and healing is yet to be elucidated. Furthermore, the embryonic cells can potentially form teratomas.

Nuclear transfer techniques have been proposed as a strategy of generating an unlimited supply of rejuvenated and histocompatible stem cells for the treatment of cardiac diseases. For this purpose, c-kit-positive fetal liver stem cells obtained from cloned embryos were injected into the border zone of infarcted mice myocardium to induce tissue reconstitution. Experimentally, these stem cells derived by nuclear transfer cloning restored infarcted myocardium.19 The magnitude of myocardial regeneration obtained in this study was significantly superior to that achieved with adult bone marrow cells. Although problems currently plague nuclear transplantation, including the potential for epigenetic and imprinting abnormalities, stem cells derived from cloned embryos are sufficiently normal to repair damaged tissue in vivo.

Fetal Cells: The clinical use of fetal cells raises ethical, immunological, and availability problems. Fetal and neonatal cardiomyocytes have been experimentally grafted into the myocardium after in vitro expansion. The presence of intercalated disks and connexin 43, a marker of gap junctions required for cell-to-cell electrical coupling, has been observed within grafted cardiomyocytes and between grafted cells and host myocytes.

Vascular Endothelial Cells can be harvested from the intima of autologous arteries (e.g. segments of the radial artery) or peripheral veins. After ex vivo expansion, these cells are transplanted into ischemic myocardium.5 This approach illustrates the advantage of inducing and moderating angiogenesis without the limitations of the release of a single protein (VEGF, bFGF). Endothelial cells induce an extensive capillary network, but they might not induce the formation of sufficient conduit vessels to regenerate the ischemic myocardium.

Mesothelial Cells are accessible in human patients by excision and digestion of epiploon or from peritoneal fluid or lavage. They are also easy to culture to obtain large quantities in vitro and they can be genetically modified. This cell type is probably the precursor of coronary arteries during embryogenesis, they secrete a broad spectrum of angiogenic cytokines including SDF-1{alpha}, growth factors and extracellular matrix molecules. Indeed mesothelial cells are transitional mesodermal-derived cells, but share similar morphological and functional properties with endothelial cells and conserve properties of transdifferentiation. These cells have been used experimentally to create neoangiogenesis in an experimental model of myocardial infarction.20

Smooth Muscle Cells can be obtained from a segment of artery, the vermiform appendix, or the uterus during laparoscopy. After implantation in pathologic myocardium, smooth muscle cells proliferate and hypertrophy in response to the stress of cardiac contractions.8 Due to the difficulties in obtaining these cells from patients’ tissues (in comparison to simple skeletal muscle biopsies) and considering that their effects are similar to those of skeletal myoblasts, smooth muscle cells seem to be destined exclusively to experimentation for the moment.

Adipose Tissue Stroma Cells: White adipose tissue has long attracted attention because of its great and reversible capacity for expansion, which appears to be permanent throughout adult life. Adipose tissue enlargement is the result of adipocyte hypertrophy and the recruitment and differentiation of regenerative precursors located in the stromal-vascular fraction (SVF). However, development of the capillary network is also required to ensure adipose tissue remodeling. Indeed, a crucial link exists between adipose cells and the capillary network.21

SVF represents a heterogeneous cell population surrounding adipocytes in fat tissue, including mature microvascular endothelial cells. This fraction was also reported to be a convenient and nonrestrictive source of pluripotent cells such as hematopoietic progenitors and spare mesodermal stem cells able to differentiate into osteogenic, chondrogenic, and myogenic lineages. The understanding of adipose tissue development and plasticity opens a new perspective for angiogenic therapy based on the administration of adipose tissue-derived stem cells in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Interestingly, spontaneous cardiomyocyte differentiation from adipose tissue stroma cells has been observed.22

Dental Stem Cells: Teeth develop from reciprocal interactions between mesenchymal cells and epithelium, where the epithelium provides the instructive information for initiation. Embryonic stem cells, neural stem cells, and adult bone marrow-derived cells all respond by expressing odontogenic genes. The dental pulp seems to be a viable source of easily attainable cells with possible potential for development of autologous cell transplantation therapies. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) mRNA is highly expressed by dental pulp cells prior to the initiation of dental pulp innervation. A recent study showed that a population of neural crest-derived dental pulp cells acquire clear neuronal morphology and protein expression profile in vitro, indicating the presence of a cell population in the dental pulp with neuronal differentiation capacity that might provide additional benefits when grafted into the central nervous system (e.g. in patients with Parkinson’s disease).23

Other studies suggest that the periodontal ligament (PDL) contains stem cells that have the potential to generate cementum/PDL-like tissue in vivo. Transplantation of these cells, which can be obtained from an easily accessible tissue resource and expanded ex vivo, might hold promise as a therapeutic approach for reconstruction of tissues destroyed by periodontal diseases. Dental epithelial and mesenchymal stem cells can be maintained and expanded in vitro and may be proposed for regenerative medicine and biology.

G-CSF Cytokine Therapy: Stem cell mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor cytokine (G-CSF) can be used as a single therapy for myocardial regeneration. Mobilized stem cells have been used to repair cardiac tissue following acute myocardial infarction. Cell mobilization is achieved by systemic administration of G-CSF. Experimental and clinical studies suggest that cell mobilization by hematopoietic growth factors can promote angiogenesis in the infarcted myocardium.24 This therapeutic approach should be evaluated carefully since risks related to the occlusion of microcoronary circulation exist,25 as well as the possibility to increase the number of inflammatory cells which may destabilize atherosclerotic plaques.


    INDICATIONS AND INCLUSION CRITERIA
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 IMPACT OF HEART FAILURE
 VENTRICULAR REMODELING
 CELL THERAPY
 INDICATIONS AND INCLUSION...
 TECHNIQUES FOR CELL INJECTION
 CLINICAL TRIALS
 NEW DEVELOPMENTS
 CONCLUSION
 FUTURE PROSPECTS
 REFERENCES
 
Indications for cellular CMP concerns patients who have had a left- or right-ventricular infarction. Ischemic mitral regurgitation also constitutes a valid indication for cell therapy.26 Patients with both idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, and cardiomyopathy of Chagas disease27 have undergone trials of CMP. The principal inclusion criteria for cellular CMP are deterioration of the left ventricular function assessed by echocardiography with an LV ejection fraction between 20% and 40% and a previous history of transmural myocardial infarction that is non-viable, akinetic, and not a candidate for standard myocardial revascularization. Preoperative studies should includevirus-freetests, evaluation of heart failure symptoms, neurohormonal activation, and assessment of myocardial viability and function (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Preoperative Assessment for Cellular Cardiomyoplasty
 
LIMITATIONS OF CELLULAR CMP
Importantly, LV wall thickness at echocardiographic evaluation should be greater than 4mm to avoid extramyocardial injection and the risk of iatrogenic ventricular wall injury due to the multiple injection points. As well, massive myocardial infarctions (greater than 1/3 of the LV surface) generally associated with dyskinetic postischemic scars are currently not suitable for cellular CMP. Patients with a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation should be evaluated carefully, since transplant cell-induced arrhythmias are a potential complication. Furthermore, subjects with positive tests to viral disease should be excluded, since the manipulation of cells infected with viruses represents a high risk of contamination for scientists involved in cell culture procedures.

MECHANISMS OF ACTION
Current research on the mechanisms by which cell transplantation brings a functional benefit is based on the following hypotheses. The implanted cells seem to provide a supporting "band-aid"-scaffolding effect, which can limit the spread of the infarcted area, preventing excessive remodeling of the ventricle. This hypothesis is strongly suggested by experimental and clinical observations showing a reduction in the telediastolic volumes of the cell transplanted hearts. Therapeutic strategies that limit adverse matrix remodeling in heart failure may prevent ventricular dilatation and maintain the structural support necessary for effective cardiomyocyte contraction. Many studies are investigating the effects of cell transplantation on the fibrillar collagen network.

In the case of skeletal myoblasts, the mechanism may involve mechanical stimulation exerted by the surrounding cardiomyocytes via extracellular matrixes through which mechanical impulses would be transferred via a "coupling effect". The modalities and condition of the connection of the myoblasts to this matrix have to be precisely specified. The hypothesis that the transplanted cells may be a source of releasing growth hormones and angiogenic factors, which may increase their survival and even restore the contractile function of a dormant myocardium, is not confirmed. Our group has done experimental studies with myoblasts in association with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The angiogenesis induced by myoblast transplantation was not superior to that observed in the case of a cellular culture medium injection.28

In the case of bone marrow cell transplantation, principally when specific progenitors are grafted, the intrinsic contractile characteristics of the differentiated cells will be implicated, and the functional benefit will be related to the improvement of the systolic function. The presence of cell type gap-junctions would allow the electrical influx to be propagated between the host cells and the graft cells, which would contract in a synchronous fashion. In addition, the angiogenic effects of bone marrow cells should contribute to the recovery of stunned and hibernating myocardium.


    TECHNIQUES FOR CELL INJECTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 IMPACT OF HEART FAILURE
 VENTRICULAR REMODELING
 CELL THERAPY
 INDICATIONS AND INCLUSION...
 TECHNIQUES FOR CELL INJECTION
 CLINICAL TRIALS
 NEW DEVELOPMENTS
 CONCLUSION
 FUTURE PROSPECTS
 REFERENCES
 
Recent advances in the treatment of heart disease, in particular cellular cardiomyoplasty, cardiovascular gene therapy, and therapeutic angiogenesis, highlight the need for efficient and practical local delivery methods to the heart. New technologies for cell implantation, derived from interventional cardiology procedures, are emerging. Intracoronary and endoventricular catheter-based cell delivery procedures for therapeutic angiogenesis and myogenesis have been performed. Whatever the transmyocardial route, whether via the epicardium or endocardium, one must mention the high mortality of the cells. This mortality is probably linked to the injection itself and the poor vascular supply of chronic postinfarct scars. (Table 3Go)


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Methods of Cell Implantation
 
Surgical cell implantation is performed into well-exposed ischemic areas, permitting multiple injection points within and principally around the infarct, with a 25G x 40 mm retrobulbar ophthalmic needle. Our approach consisted of performing the main implantation in the peri-infarct area (70% of cells), since residual irrigation and collateral myocardial revascularization in this border zone allows for better survival of the implanted cells. The remaining 30% of cells are implanted in the central portion of the scar. Video-assisted thoracoscopic cell implantation was successfully achieved in a recent experimental study.29

Percutaneous selective coronary artery cannulation for cell injection can be used for myocardial regeneration.3031 This intravascular delivery is based on the potential migratory properties of some cells which retain their ability to cross the basal lamina. This approach should be reserved for mononuclear bone marrow cells, since intracoronary delivery of skeletal myoblasts and bone marrow mesenchymal cells could provoke microemboli.32 In fact, the myoblasts size (length 25–30 µm) and shape (stellar and spindle-shaped) are more prone to embolizations than bone marrow mononuclear cells (spherical and disc-shaped, diameter 8–18 µm).


    CLINICAL TRIALS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 IMPACT OF HEART FAILURE
 VENTRICULAR REMODELING
 CELL THERAPY
 INDICATIONS AND INCLUSION...
 TECHNIQUES FOR CELL INJECTION
 CLINICAL TRIALS
 NEW DEVELOPMENTS
 CONCLUSION
 FUTURE PROSPECTS
 REFERENCES
 
Skeletal myoblast and bone marrow cell transplantation are the current modes that represent the greatest international interest for clinical myocardial regeneration. Since June 2000, more than 200 patients with ischemic myocardial disease and some with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy have been treated in Europe, the Americas, and Asia.4,3342 The number of surgical implantations was equivalent to those of percutaneous catheter-based procedures, and the number of patients treated with autologous skeletal myoblasts was equivalent to those treated with bone marrow cells. However, there is a tendency to use bone marrow cells for myocardial regeneration since this approach avoids the 3-week cell-culture procedure and the risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death observed after skeletal myoblast transplantation.

The experimental results in the field of cell transplantation for myocardial regeneration led our team to perform multicenter clinical trials.26 In our experience, the best clinical results of cellular CMP seem to be obtained in patients presenting a heterogeneous infarct area (patchy appearance), i.e. a mixture of viable myocardial tissue and multiple small scars. So a "vascularized fibrosis" might be a more appropriate lesion to be treated by cells than a "non-vascularized" postinfarction scar.


    NEW DEVELOPMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 IMPACT OF HEART FAILURE
 VENTRICULAR REMODELING
 CELL THERAPY
 INDICATIONS AND INCLUSION...
 TECHNIQUES FOR CELL INJECTION
 CLINICAL TRIALS
 NEW DEVELOPMENTS
 CONCLUSION
 FUTURE PROSPECTS
 REFERENCES
 
Since 1996, our group has been working on the following original research protocols:

1. ELECTROSTIMULATED "DYNAMIC" CELLULAR CMP
Ex vivo Pre-implant Cell Electrostimulation
Electrostimulation was investigated by our group for driving the conditioning process of bone marrow stem cells towards cardiac-type myogenic cells. Electrostimulation of human bone marrow cell cultures for myogenic preconditioning have been performed in our laboratory, the protocol consists of "in vitro" bipolar electrostimulation of cell cultures using an external pacemaker and specific electrodes. After 3 weeks, we observed an increase in cell multiplication, cell reorganization, and myogenic differentiation. Since stem cells can differentiate into fibroblasts after implantation in myocardial scars, this method might be used to precondition stem cells before implantation.43

In vivo Post-implant Cell Electrostimulation
Atrial synchronized biventricular pacing is indicated in many heart failure patients to correct conduction disorders associated with chronic systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Electrostimulation associated with cellular cardiomyoplasty was performed experimentally by our group to transform passive cell therapy into "dynamic cellular support". Thus, the principles of electrophysiological conditioning of muscle fibers (e.g., dynamic cardiomyoplasty) were applied in our laboratory in cellular cardiomyoplasty. Electrostimulation of both ventricles following skeletal myoblast implantation induced the contraction of the transplanted cells and a higher expression of slow myosin, better adapted for chronic ventricular assistance.44

2. AUTOLOGOUS-HUMAN-SERUM FOR CELL CULTURE
Traditional cell culture techniques involve the use of fetal bovine serum for cell growth. Contact of human cells with fetal bovine serum results in, after a 3-week fixation, animal proteins on the cell surface, representing an antigenic substrate for immunological and inflammatory adverse events. After cell implantation into the heart, an inflammatory reaction can occur with subsequent fibrosis, representing a risk for micro re-entry circuits that can generate ectopic ventricular arrhythmias. Thus, directly injecting skeletal myoblast-derived cells cultivated with bovine serum into ischemic myocardium seems to provide the substrate for electrical instability leading to malignant arrhythmias. In fact, current clinical experience with cellular cardiomyoplasty using serum bovine-cultivated myoblasts has demonstrated significant malignant ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death in patients; therefore, in several ongoing clinical trials, implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators becomes mandatory.3536

To reduce the risk of arrhythmias, a total autologous cell culture procedure was used by our group in 20 patients treated with skeletal myoblasts.45 Cells were cultivated without cytokines in a complete human medium over 3 weeks, using the patient’s own serum obtained from plasmapheresis or from blood samples. This approach obviated the need for the implantation of defibrillators. An additional benefit of human-autologous-serum cell expansion is that it can be performed without risk of prions, viral, or zoonoses contamination. Since patients treated with non-cultivated bone marrow cells are free of arrhythmias, we can extrapolate that the bovine-culture medium used for myoblast expansion could be responsible for this complication.

3. NEW "CELL-FIX" CATHETER FOR INFARCT DETECTION AND CELL DELIVERY
New technologies for cell implantation derived from interventional cardiology procedures are emerging. Intracoronary and endoventricular catheter-based cell delivery procedures for therapeutic angiogenesis and myogenesis have been performed. Nevertheless, the quantity of the cells injected in the target infarcted area is unknown, despite the use of myocardial mapping to identify the pathologic myocardium. The success is largely dependent on many technical considerations, namely, the risk of cell loss at the moment of injection and the precise localization of the post-ischemic scar and the peri-infarct areas.

A new diagnostic-therapeutic electrode catheter for local myocardial treatment has been created by our group, called "CELL-FIX" catheter. This second generation system includes a method and apparatus to identify by electrophysiology the infarcted area and simultaneously to deliver the cells, stabilizing the scar by vacuum at the moment of injection.46


    CONCLUSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 IMPACT OF HEART FAILURE
 VENTRICULAR REMODELING
 CELL THERAPY
 INDICATIONS AND INCLUSION...
 TECHNIQUES FOR CELL INJECTION
 CLINICAL TRIALS
 NEW DEVELOPMENTS
 CONCLUSION
 FUTURE PROSPECTS
 REFERENCES
 
Research in heart failure is relevant and important, involving specialties such as cellular and molecular biology, genetics, biophysics, and biomedical engineering. The prevalence of severe heart failure and the clear clinical limitations of conventional interventions have encouraged the development of new methods based on the regeneration of the pool of myocardial contractile cells. This approach is supported by recent advances in cellular physiology.

New therapeutic approaches to myocardial regeneration aim to augment the effects of the loss of cardiomyocytes, which is generally considered irreversible, and the cause of the cardiac insufficiency. Although terminal differentiation of cardiomyocytes is disputed, it appears as a permanent turnover of contractile cells, which also occurs in cases of cardiac insufficiency. This might not be enough to compensate the cell death due to a pathological process. In particular, myocardial infarction leaves an akinetic fibrotic scar, which with remodeling leads to ventricular dilation and an overall loss of the mechanical function of the heart.

It is accepted that cardiomyocytes are differentiated cells without the capacity to proliferate and, therefore, to regenerate. However, recently published studies suggest that in patients who suffered an acute myocardial infarction, there is a small percentage of cardiomyocytes able to enter actively into the cell cycle. The low proportion of proliferating cells in relation to the damaged muscle makes the clinical impact, in the best of cases, limited.4748 From fetal cardiac tissues or from cell lines grown "in vitro", it has been demonstrated that it is possible to obtain stable cardiac grafts in experimental models. However, the long-term functionality of these grafts and the need to use immunosuppression due to the fact that they are allogenic tissues, together with the ethical aspects derived from the use of embryonic tissues in human, limits its clinical application.

Cellular CMP for ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies27,49 is a rapidly burgeoning field, in view of the number of randomized controlled trials of this treatment modality currently in progress or being initiated. The idea of transplanting single cells has a number of attractive attributes and is dependent on an ever-expanding understanding of the molecular basis of angiogenesis and myogenesis. Cellular therapy’s primary objective is to ensure the recolonization and restoration of postinfarction myocardial tissue, thus improving viability and function. Left and/or right ventricular infarction and ischemic mitral regurgitation constitute valid indications for cell therapy.26

Cellular CMP appears to be a promising technique capable of restoring ventricular function and limiting or reversing remodeling in patients following myocardial infarction. It can be considered that cellular angiogenic therapy (using bone marrow or other cells) may be performed in myocardial infarction, before myogenic cell transplantation (using skeletal myoblasts), to improve local conditions for cell survival (preconditioning).5051 The development of new catheters for percutaneous cell delivery should facilitate this combined approach. In summary, cell transplantation already offers the promise to induce angiogenesis, restore myocardial viability and regional ventricular function, therefore limiting remodeling for patients who have had a non-massive myocardial infarction and probably for patients presenting with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.


    FUTURE PROSPECTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 IMPACT OF HEART FAILURE
 VENTRICULAR REMODELING
 CELL THERAPY
 INDICATIONS AND INCLUSION...
 TECHNIQUES FOR CELL INJECTION
 CLINICAL TRIALS
 NEW DEVELOPMENTS
 CONCLUSION
 FUTURE PROSPECTS
 REFERENCES
 
Cellular transplantation for myocardial angiogenesis and myogenesis still raise several questions regarding cell delivery, cell survival, and cell injection site. The cell injection efficiency of epicardial, endocardial, and intracoronary cell delivery is still unknown. The low rate of cell survival and the effects when the injections are performed in the center of the infarct instead of the peri-infarct zones warrants additional research. The development of strategies for improving cell survival and differentiation, for instance, by using prevascularization and preconditioning procedures, seems to be of great interest.5253

One hypothesis is that staged procedures of cell delivery could be necessary to regenerate large postischemic scars. In these cases, catheter-based procedures should play an essential role. The different cell sources, principally skeletal myoblast and bone marrow cells, should provide complementary beneficial effects. The association of cell-based angiogenic and myogenic therapy showed important benefits in experimental models of myocardial regeneration.5455

The effects of cell therapy on cardiac function need to be further investigated, analyzing the contribution of transplanted cells to myocardial contractility, since until now the effects of this therapy seem principally limited to stabilization or reduction of ventricular dilatation and reverse remodeling. It appears that cell therapy can be beneficial either following acute myocardial infarction or several months after the ischemic complication. Preliminary clinical reports show promising data in this respect.

Most of these questions will probably be answered in ongoing clinical investigations. It is also likely that cell therapy, the biology of its development, growth factors, and genetic manipulations might mutually benefit from their respective advances. Tissue engineering will probably contribute to the healing process, incorporating exogenous pro-angiogenic matrix onto dyskinetic thin infarct scars (e.g. dyskinetic scars with less than 4 mm of ventricular wall thickness).56 These fields must be considered as complementary with combined strategies of revolutionizing the treatment of myocardial injury.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 IMPACT OF HEART FAILURE
 VENTRICULAR REMODELING
 CELL THERAPY
 INDICATIONS AND INCLUSION...
 TECHNIQUES FOR CELL INJECTION
 CLINICAL TRIALS
 NEW DEVELOPMENTS
 CONCLUSION
 FUTURE PROSPECTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Chachques JC, Shafy A, Duarte F, Cattadori B, Goussef N, Shen L, et al. From dynamic to cellular cardiomyoplasty. J Card Surg 2002;17:194–200.[Medline]

  2. Di Donato M, Toso A, Dor V, Sabatier M, Barletta G, Menicanti L, et al; RESTORE Group. Surgical ventricular restoration improves mechanical intraventricular dyssynchrony in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2004;109:2536–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Benicio A, Moreira LF, Bacal F, Stolf NA, Oliveira SA. Reevaluation of long-term outcomes of dynamic cardiomyoplasty. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:821–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Haider HKh, Tan AC, Aziz S, Chachques JC, Sim EK. Myoblast transplantation for cardiac repair: a clinical perspective. Mol Ther 2004;9:14–23.[Medline]

  5. Chiu RC. Therapeutic cardiac angiogenesis and myogenesis: the promises and challenges on a new frontier. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:851–2.[Free Full Text]

  6. El Oakley RM, Ooi OC, Bongso A, Yacoub MH. Myocyte transplantation for myocardial repair: a few good cells can mend a broken heart. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:1724–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Chiu RC, Zibaitis A, Kao RL. Cellular cardiomyoplasty: myocardial regeneration with satellite cell implantation. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:12–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  8. Tang GH, Fedak PW, Yau TM, Weisel RD, Kulik A, Mickle DA, et al. Cell transplantation to improve ventricular function in the failing heart. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:907–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  9. Law PK. Myoblast transplantation. Science 1992;257:1329–30.[Free Full Text]

  10. Rajnoch C, Chachques JC, Berrebi A, Bruneval P, Benoit MO, Carpentier A. Cellular therapy reverses myocardial dysfunction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:871–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  11. Sim EK, Jiang S, Ye L, Lim YL, Ooi OC, Haider KH. Skeletal myoblast transplant in heart failure. J Card Surg 2003;18:319–27.[Medline]

  12. Tambara K, Sakakibara Y, Sakaguchi G, Lu F, Premaratne GU, Lin X, et al. Transplanted skeletal myoblasts can fully replace the infarcted myocardium when they survive in the host in large numbers. Circulation 2003;108(Suppl 1):II259–63.

  13. Chachques JC, Cattadori B, Herreros J, Prosper F, Trainini JC, Blanchard D, et al. Treatment of heart failure with autologous skeletal myoblasts. Herz 2002;27:570–8.[Medline]

  14. Yau TM, Tomita S, Weisel RD, Jia ZQ, Tumiati LC, Mickle DA, et al. Beneficial effect of autologous cell transplantation on infarcted heart function: comparison between bone marrow stromal cells and heart cells. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:169–177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Fujii T, Yau TM, Weisel RD, Ohno N, Mickle DA, Shiono N, et al. Cell transplantation to prevent heart failure: a comparison of cell types. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:2062–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  16. Bittira B, Kuang JQ, Al-Khaldi A, Shum-Tim D, Chiu RC. In vitro preprogramming of marrow stromal cells for myocardial regeneration. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1154–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  17. Stamm C, Westphal B, Kleine HD, Petzsch M, Kittner C, Klinge H, et al. Autologous bone-marrow stem-cell transplantation for myocardial regeneration. Lancet 2003;361:45–6.[Medline]

  18. He JQ, Ma Y, Lee Y, Thomson JA, Kamp TJ. Human embryonic stem cells develop into multiple types of cardiac myocytes: action potential characterization. Circ Res 2003;93:32–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Lanza R, Moore MA, Wakayama T, Perry AC, Shieh JH, Hendrikx J, et al. Regeneration of the infarcted heart with stem cells derived by nuclear transplantation. Circ Res 2004;94:820–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  20. Elmadbouh I, Chen Y, Louedec L, Osborne-Pellegrin M, Silberman S, Meilhac O, et al. Mesothelial cell transplantation in the post-myocardial infarct scar induces angiogenesis and improves heart function. Circulation 2004; 110 (Suppl. III): 303.

  21. Planat-Benard V, Silvestre JS, Cousin B, Andre M, Nibbelink M, Tamarat R, et al. Plasticity of human adipose lineage cells toward endothelial cells: physiological and therapeutic perspectives. Circulation 2004;109:656–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  22. Planat-Benard V, Menard C, Andre M, Puceat M, Perez A, Garcia-Verdugo JM, et al. Spontaneous cardiomyocyte differentiation from adipose tissue stroma cells. Circ Res 2004;94:223–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  23. Nosrat IV, Smith CA, Mullally P, Olson L, Nosrat CA. Dental pulp cells provide neurotrophic support for dopaminergic neurons and differentiate into neurons in vitro; implications for tissue engineering and repair in the nervous system. Eur J Neurosci 2004;19:2388–98.[Medline]

  24. Norol F, Merlet P, Isnard R, Sebillon P, Bonnet N, Cailliot C, et al. Influence of mobilized stem cells on myocardial infarct repair in a nonhuman primate model. Blood 2003;102:4361–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  25. Matsubara H. Risk to the coronary arteries of intracoronary stem cell infusion and G-CSF cytokine therapy. Lancet 2004;363:746–7.[Medline]

  26. Chachques JC, Acar C, Herreros J, Trainini J, Prosper F, D’Attellis N, et al. Cellular cardiomyoplasty: clinical application. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1121–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  27. Vilas-Boas F, Feitosa GS, Soares MB, Pinho-Filho JA, Mota A, Almeida AJ, et al. Bone marrow cell transplantation to the myocardium of a patient with heart failure due to Chagas’ disease. Arq Bras Cardiol 2004;82:185–7, 181–4.[Medline]

  28. Chachques JC, Duarte F, Cattadori B, Shafy A, Lila N, Chatellier G, et al. Angiogenic growth factors and/or cellular therapy for myocardial regeneration: a comparative study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:245–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  29. Thompson RB, Parsa CJ, van den Bos EJ, Davis BH, Toloza EM, Klem I, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic transplantation of myoblasts into the heart. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:303–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  30. Strauer BE, Brehm M, Zeus T, Kostering M, Hernandez A, Sorg RV, et al. Repair of infarcted myocardium by autologous intracoronary mononuclear bone marrow cell transplantation in humans. Circulation 2002;106:1913–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  31. Assmus B, Schächinger V, Teupe C, Britten M, Lehmann R, Dobert N, et al. Transplantation of Progenitor Cells and Regeneration Enhancement in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TOPCARE-AMI). Circulation 2002;106:3009–17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  32. Vulliet PR, Greeley M, Halloran SM, MacDonald KA, Kittleson MD. Intra-coronary arterial injection of mesenchymal stromal cells and microinfarction in dogs. Lancet 2004;363:783–4.[Medline]

  33. Herreros J, Prosper F, Perez A, Gavira JJ, Garcia-Velloso MJ, Barba J, et al. Autologous intramyocardial injection of cultured skeletal muscle-derived stem cells in patients with non-acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2003;24:2012–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  34. Trainini JC, Lago N, De Paz J, Cichero D, Giordano R, Mouras J, et al. Myoblast transplantation for myocardial repair: a clinical case. J Heart Lung Transplant 2004;23:503–5.[Medline]

  35. Menasche P, Hagege AA, Vilquin JT, Desnos M, Abergel E, Pouzet B, et al. Autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation for severe postinfarction left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1078–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  36. Smits PC, van Geuns RJ, Poldermans D, Bountioukos M, Onderwater EE, Lee CH, et al. Catheter-based intramyocardial injection of autologous skeletal myoblasts as a primary treatment of ischemic heart failure: clinical experience with six-month follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:2063–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  37. Hamano K, Nishida M, Hirata K, Mikamo A, Li TS, Harada M, et al. Local implantation of autologous bone marrow cells for therapeutic angiogenesis in patients with ischemic heart disease: clinical trial and preliminary results. Jpn Circ J 2001;65:845–7.[Medline]

  38. Tse HF, Kwong YL, Chan JK, Lo G, Ho CL, Lau CP. Angiogenesis in ischaemic myocardium by intramyocardial autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell implantation. Lancet 2003;361:47–9.[Medline]

  39. Zhang F, Yang Z, Chen Y, Qin J, Zhu T, Xu D, et al. Clinical cellular cardiomyoplasty: technical considerations. J Card Surg 2003;18:268–73.[Medline]

  40. Pagani FD, DerSimonian H, Zawadzka A, Wetzel K, Edge AS, Jacoby DB, et al. Autologous skeletal myoblasts transplanted to ischemia-damaged myocardium in humans. Histological analysis of cell survival and differentiation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:879–88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  41. Fuchs S, Satler LF, Kornowski R, Okubagzi P, Weisz G, Baffour R, et al. Catheter-based autologous bone marrow myocardial injection in no-option patients with advanced coronary artery disease: a feasibility study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1721–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  42. Perin EC, Dohmann HF, Borojevic R, Silva SA, Sousa AL, Mesquita CT, et al. Transendocardial, autologous bone marrow cell transplantation for severe, chronic ischemic heart failure. Circulation 2003;107:2294–302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  43. Chachques JC. Method of providing a dynamic cellular cardiac support. US patents A2002 0124855 and A2005 0002912.

  44. Chachques JC, Shafy A, Cattadori B, Duarte F, Shen L, Meimoun P, et al. Electrostimulation enhanced fatigue resistant myosin expression in cellular cardiomyoplasty. Circulation. 2001;104(Suppl 2):555–6.

  45. Chachques JC, Herreros J, Trainini J, Juffe A, Rendal E, Prosper F, et al. Autologous human serum for cell culture avoids the implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators in cellular cardiomyoplasty. Int J Cardiol 2004;95 (Suppl 1):S29–33.

  46. Chachques JC, Herreros J, Lorusso R. New "Cell-Fix" catheter for infarct detection and cell delivery. Int J Cardiol 2004;95 (Suppl 1):S70.

  47. Taylor DA, Hruban R, Rodriguez ER, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ. Cardiac chimerism as a mechanism for self-repair: does it happen and if so to what degree? Circulation 2002;106:2–4.[Free Full Text]

  48. Hocht-Zeisberg E, Kahnert H, Guan K, Wulf G, Hemmerlein B, Schlott T, et al. Cellular repopulation of myocardial infarction in patients with sex-mismatched heart transplantation. Eur Heart J 2004;25:749–58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  49. Ohno N, Fedak PW, Weisel RD, Komeda M, Mickle DA, Li RK. Cell transplantation in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. A novel biological approach for ventricular restoration. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;50:457–60.[Medline]

  50. Miyagawa S, Sawa Y, Taketani S, Kawaguchi N, Nakamura T, Matsuura N, et al. Myocardial regeneration therapy for heart failure: hepatocyte growth factor enhances the effect of cellular cardiomyoplasty. Circulation 2002;105:2556–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  51. Retuerto MA, Schalch P, Patejunas G, Carbray J, Liu N, Esser K, et al. Angiogenic pretreatment improves the efficacy of cellular cardiomyoplasty performed with fetal cardiomyocyte implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1041–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  52. Murry CE, Soonpaa MH, Reinecke H, Nakajima H, Nakajima HO, Rubart M, et al. Haematopoietic stem cells do not transdifferentiate into cardiac myocytes in myocardial infarcts. Nature 2004;428:664–8.[Medline]

  53. Iijima Y, Nagai T, Mizukami M, Matsuura K, Ogura T, Wada H, et al. Beating is necessary for transdifferentiation of skeletal muscle-derived cells into cardiomyocytes. FASEB J 2003;17:1361–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  54. Ott HC, Bonaros N, Marksteiner R, Wolf D, Margreiter E, Schachner T, et al. Combined transplantation of skeletal myoblasts and bone marrow stem cells for myocardial repair in rats. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:627–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  55. Carvalho KA, Guarita-Souza LC, Rebelatto CL, Senegaglia AC, Hansen P, Mendonca JG, et al. Could the coculture of skeletal myoblasts and mesenchymal stem cells be a solution for postinfarction myocardial scar? Transplant Proc 2004;36:991–2.[Medline]

  56. McDevitt TC, Woodhouse KA, Hauschka SD, Murry CE, Stayton PS. Spatially organized layers of cardiomyocytes on biodegradable polyurethane films for myocardial repair. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;66:586–95.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
J. C Chachques, O. Jegaden, T. Mesana, Y. Glock, P. A Grandjean, and A. F Carpentier
Cardiac Bioassist: Results of the French Multicenter Cardiomyoplasty Study
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2009; 17(6): 573 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
S. Guhathakurta, U. R Subramanyan, R. Balasundari, C. K Das, N. Madhusankar, and K. M. Cherian
Stem Cell Experiments and Initial Clinical Trial of Cellular Cardiomyoplasty
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2009; 17(6): 581 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. Shafy, T. Lavergne, C. Latremouille, M. Cortes-Morichetti, A. Carpentier, and J. C. Chachques
Association of electrostimulation with cell transplantation in ischemic heart disease
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2009; 138(4): 994 - 1001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. C. Chachques
Cardiomyoplasty: is it still a viable option in patients with end-stage heart failure?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2009; 35(2): 201 - 203.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. C. Chachques, J. C. Trainini, N. Lago, M. Cortes-Morichetti, O. Schussler, and A. Carpentier
Myocardial Assistance by Grafting a New Bioartificial Upgraded Myocardium (MAGNUM Trial): Clinical Feasibility Study
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 901 - 908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
R. P. Gallegos and R. M. Bolman III
Stem Cell Induced Regeneration of Myocardium
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1657 - 1668.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Juan C Chachques
Paul Lajos
Alain Carpentier
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chachques, J. C
Right arrow Articles by Carpentier, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chachques, J. C
Right arrow Articles by Carpentier, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Education
Right arrow Coronary disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS