Asian Annals Activate Your Online Account to Asian Annals
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Surin Woragidpoonpol
Weerachai Nawarawong
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tepsuwan, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nawarawong, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tepsuwan, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nawarawong, W.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Incidence and Impact of Cardiac Cachexia in Valvular Surgery

Thitipong Tepsuwan, MD, Suphachai Schuarattanapong, MD, Surin Woragidpoonpol, MD, Supap Kulthawong, BSc, Anong Chaiyasri, MSc, Weerachai Nawarawong, MD

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

Thitipong Tepsuwan, MD, Tel: +66 53 94 5533, Fax: +66 53 94 6139, Email: Thitipong_tepsuwan{at}yahoo.com, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.

ABSTRACT

Cardiac cachexia is a wasting feature of advanced heart failure, which is due to several etiologies and associated with a poor prognosis. This study assessed the incidence and impact of cardiac cachexia retrospectively in 353 patients who underwent valve surgery from June 2005 to June 2006. Using 80% of ideal body weight as a cut-off point, 46 (13%) of these patients were considered to have cardiac cachexia. Patients with cachexia were predominantly male with more underlying diseases and a lower body mass index than those without cachexia. The New York Heart Association functional class was significantly worse in patients with cachexia (class III/IV: 54.4% vs. 21.2%) and they had greater incidences of active infective endocarditis (21.7% vs. 5.2%) and tricuspid regurgitation (41.3% vs. 21.8%) compared to those with normal body weight. The cachexia group had significantly longer postoperative hospitalization and more complications (37% vs. 21.5%); perioperative mortality tended to be higher (6.5% vs. 2.3%) although not statistically significant. Cardiac cachexia remains an important problem in patients undergoing valve surgery, which indicates end-staged disease, and contributes to poor perioperative outcomes. Special care and attention are needed in this particular group of patients.

Key Words: Cachexia • Heart Failure • Heart Valve Diseases

INTRODUCTION

One of the important features in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) is the significant weight loss or wasting syndrome named cardiac cachexia.1 Neuroendocrine, immunologic, and metabolic abnormalities have crucial roles in the pathogenesis of this multifactorial condition. It is associated with a poor prognosis, and currently there is no established effective therapy.24 Definitions of cardiac cachexia vary among studies, but most focus on weight loss and body components. These definitions include weight loss >6% in 6 months, ideal body weight <85% or 80% of predicted, or ideal body fat <27% in males or <29% in females.5 In previous studies, the incidence of this condition ranged from 13% to 36% in patients with CHF, but these were conducted in Western countries and among patients with heart failure in general or ischemic heart diseases.6,7 Many studies have focused on whether body weight or body mass index influences outcomes after coronary bypass surgery.810 In contrast, most patients in Thailand and many regions in Asia have CHF due to heart valve problems, and there is little information on cardiac cachexia in this group. Thus the purpose of this study was to explore the effects of this syndrome in patients undergoing valve operations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was carried out in patients who underwent cardiac valve operations at Chiang Mai University Hospital from June 2005 to June 2006. Data were collected from the Cardiothoracic Unit database and from the hospital’s computer-based medical records. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Medical Faculty Review Board of Chiang Mai University. Inclusion criteria were patients over 18 years of age with acquired heart valve disease and a first-time isolated cardiac valve operation; younger patients and those with congenital or ischemic causes, redo or concomitant cardiac procedures were excluded.

Operative techniques were similar in most cases. The approach was through a median sternotomy. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established with ascending aortic cannulation, atrial/caval venous drainage, aortic crossclamping, antegrade and/or retrograde cold blood cardioplegia with mild hypothermia. Beating heart techniques were used in 1.8% of cases. The patients were divided in 2 groups based on the presence or absence of cardiac cachexia. The definition of cachexia was <80% of ideal body weight estimated by the Devine equation which is commonly used for nutritional and pharmacologic assessment:11 ideal body weight (kg) in males = [50 +2.3 + (height in cm/2.54 – 60)]; ideal body weight (kg) in females = [45.5 +2.3 x (height in cm/2.54 – 60)].

Data on preoperative patient characteristics, hemodynamic status, valve diseases and pathology, operative procedures, and postoperative courses including complications and mortality were collected and compared between cachexia and non-cachexia groups. Numerical variables are presented as proportions and/or percentages. Continuous variables are expressed as the mean and standard deviation. Data were compared between groups using the standard t test and Fisher’s exact test. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

During the study period, 353 patients fitted the inclusion criteria. Completeness of data collection was 97%–99% for all study parameters except pulmonary artery pressure which was available in 185 (52%) patients. There were 46 patients whose weights were <80% of ideal body weight; the incidence of cardiac cachexia in these valve surgery patients was 13%. Preoperative characteristics are shown in Table 1Go. The cachexia group contained significantly more males, smokers, and cases of renal failure, with lower body weight, body mass index, and hemoglobin levels than the control group of those with ≥80% of ideal body weight. Table 2Go compares the preoperative hemodynamic status between the 2 groups. Although ejection fraction and pulmonary artery pressure were comparable, the cachexia group presented in worse New York Heart Association functional class (class III/IV: 54.4% vs. 21.2%) and required more inotropic support and resuscitation before the operation. The cachexia group had a higher incidence of active infective endocarditis as a cause of valve disease (21.7% vs. 5.2%; Figure 1Go). A greater proportion of the cachexia patients had moderate to severe tricuspid insufficiency (41.3% vs. 21.8%; Figure 2Go). A higher percentage of patients in the cachexia group underwent non-elective surgery (19.6% vs.7.5%) and triple-valve operations (13.0% vs. 3.9%), as shown in Table 3Go. However, there were no differences in cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp times between groups. The cachexia group required significantly longer ventilator time, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital stay, with more complications (37% vs. 21.5%). Mortality tended to be higher among cachexia patients, but it was not statistically significant (Table 4Go). Postoperative complications are compared between groups in Table 5Go. There were 30 complications affecting 17 patients in the cachexia group, and 95 complications in 66 control patients. The incidence of new postoperative renal failure was higher in the cachexia group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Preoperative characteristics of patients undergoing valve surgery
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Preoperative hemodynamic status
 

Figure 1
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Profile of valve diseases in patients with and without cachexia undergoing valve surgery. AV = aortic valve, IE = infective endocarditis, RHD = rheumatic heart disease.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Valve pathology in patients undergoing valve surgery with and without cachexia.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Operative procedures
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Postoperative courses
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Postoperative complications in operative survivors
 
DISCUSSION

The 13% incidence of cardiac cachexia in valve surgery patients in this study is similar to the incidence of 13%–36% in previous reports.6,7 This means that surgeons have to operate on a significant number of these end-stage patients. Using weight criteria to determine cardiac cachexia, low body weight, low body mass index, and history of weight loss are related to this condition, and they are poor prognostic factors for CHF patients. Although hemoglobin levels were reduced, serum albumin and cholesterol were not linked to cachexia in this study, whereas others have shown a strong relationship of these 2 parameters to CHF as predictors of poor outcome.1214

According to its pathophysiology, cardiac cachexia usually affects patients with chronic progressive heart problems, leading to disturbances in many systems including neuroendocrine, inflammatory, and metabolic, which eventually result in loss of cardiac muscle, energy, and function, creating cardiac cachexia.4,7 These processes explain why this group had worse symptoms and more often required resuscitation and urgent operations. This study confirms that ejection fraction and pulmonary artery pressure are not associated with cachexia. However, Florea and colleagues15 demonstrated a relationship between cardiac cachexia and loss of left ventricular mass.

Advanced tricuspid regurgitation should be regarded as evidence of cardiac cachexia, and it is one of the major criteria for diagnosis of cardiac cachexia in patients with mitral valve diseases.16,17 Thus more patients with cardiac cachexia had triple-valve operations. Tricuspid lesions associated with rheumatic disease also contribute to poorer short- and long-term survival, as reported by Bernal and colleagues.18 The reason why the cachexia group had a higher incidence of active infective endocarditis may be explained by prior uncorrected underlying valve diseases and malnutrition, which increase the patient’s risk of severe infection. Another reason may be that inadequate medical treatment of infection and heart failure resulted in body wasting. Cardiac cachexia is related to worse short- and long-term survival in patients with CHF (53% vs. 83% at 3 years).1,4 This study demonstrates a strong correlation between cardiac cachexia and prolonged perioperative courses with increased complications, including devastating conditions such as new postoperative renal insufficiency.

Because this study was retrospective, limitations include uncontrolled bias and interrelated factors. There have been few studies that were prospective and/or focused on the strategies to prevent or improve this condition, such as nutritional intervention, neurohormonal and immunologic modulation, and rehabilitation.19,20 It was concluded from our findings that cardiac cachexia affects a significant number of patients undergoing valve surgery. It indicates a more advanced disease process and worse perioperative course. Strategies to prevent and to improve this condition are worth considering.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Wilaiwun Jongraksat, MNs, Consultant Statistician, Pakamas Bunyapisomparn, MNs, for her work on data processing, and the surgical teams caring for our patients.

REFERENCES

  1. Anker SD, Sharma R. The syndrome of cardiac cachexia [Review]. Int J Cardiol 2002;85:51–66.[Medline]

  2. Ponikowski P, Piepoli M, Chua TP, Banasiak W, Francis D, Anker SD, et al. The impact of cachexia on cardiorespiratory reflex control in chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 1999; 20:1667–75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Mustafa I, Leverve X. Metabolic and nutritional disorders in cardiac cachexia [Review]. Nutrition 2001;17:756–60.[Medline]

  4. von Haehling S, Doehner W, Anker SD. Nutrition, metabolism, and the complex pathophysiology of cachexia in chronic heart failure [Review]. Cardiovasc Res 2007;73:298–309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Anker SD, Coats AJ. Cardiac cachexia: a syndrome with impaired survival and immune and neuroendocrine activation [Review]. Chest 1999;115:836–47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Castillo-Martínez L, Orea-Tejeda A, Rosales MT, Ramírez EC, González VR, Lafuente EA, et al. Anthropometric variables and physical activity as predictors of cardiac cachexia. Int J Cardiol 2005;99:239–45.[Medline]

  7. Strassburg S, Anker SD. Metabolic and immunologic derangements in cardiac cachexia: where to from here [Review]? Heart Fail Rev 2006;11:57–64.[Medline]

  8. Wagner BD, Grunwald GK, Rumsfeld JS, Hill JO, Ho PM, Wyatt HR, et al. Relationship of body mass index with outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:10–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  9. Reeves BC, Ascione R, Chamberlain MH, Angelini GD. Effect of body mass index on early outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:668–76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  10. Potapov EV, Loebe M, Anker S, Stein J, Bondy S, Nasseri BA, et al. Impact of body mass index on outcome in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting with and without valve surgery. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1933–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  11. Pai MP, Paloucek FP. The origin of the "ideal" body weight equations. Ann Phamacother 2000;34:1066–9.[Abstract]

  12. Engelman DT, Adams DH, Byrne JG, Aranki SF, Collins JJ, Couper GS, et al. Impact of body mass index and albumin on morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:866–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  13. Rapp-Kesek D, Ståhle E, Karlsson TT. Body mass index and albumin in the preoperative evaluation of cardiac surgery patients. Clin Nutr 2004;23:1398–404.[Medline]

  14. Rauchhaus M, Clark AL, Doehner W, Davos C, Bolger A, Sharma R, et al. The relationship between cholesterol and survival in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1933–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Florea VG, Henein MY, Rauchhaus M, Koloczek V, Sharma R, Doehner W, et al. The cardiac component of cardiac cachexia. Am Heart J 2002;144:45–50.[Medline]

  16. Ajayi AA, Adigun AQ, Ojofeitimi EO, Yusuph H, Ajayi OE. Anthropometric evaluation of cachexia in chronic congestive heart failure: the role of tricuspid regurgitation. Int J Cardiol 1999;71:79–84.[Medline]

  17. Otaki M. Surgical treatment of patients with cardiac cachexia. An analysis of factors affecting operative mortality. Chest 1994;105:1347–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  18. Bernal JM, Pontón A, Diaz B, Llorca J, Garcia I, Sarralde A, et al. Surgery for rheumatic tricuspid valve disease: a 30-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:476–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Tepaske R, Velthuis H, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Heisterkamp SH, van Deventer SJ, Ince C, et al. Effect of preoperative oral immune-enhancing nutritional supplement on patient sat high risk of infection after cardiac surgery: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2001; 358:696–701.[Medline]

  20. Adigun AQ, Ajayi AA. The effects of enalapril-digoxin-diuretic combination therapy on nutritional and anthropometric indices in chronic congestive heart failure: preliminary findings in cardiac cachexia. Eur J Heart Fail 2001;3:359–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2009; 17:617-621
© 2009 by SAGE Publications
DOI: 10.1177/0218492309349093




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Surin Woragidpoonpol
Weerachai Nawarawong
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tepsuwan, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nawarawong, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tepsuwan, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nawarawong, W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS