Asian Annals Activate Your Online Account to Asian Annals
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ali Fedakar
Ilker Mataraci
Ercan Eren
Rahmi Zeybek
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fedakar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zeybek, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fedakar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zeybek, R.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Repair of Left Ventricular Pseudoaneurysms

Ali Fedakar, MD, Onursal Bugra, MD, Alper Onk, MD, Ilker Mataraci, MD, Ercan Eren, MD, Rahmi Zeybek, MD

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kartal Kosuyolu Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital Istanbul, Turkey

Ali Fedakar, MD, Tel: +90 216 4594041, Fax: +90 216 4596321, Email: alfdkr67{at}hotmail.com, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kartal Kosuyolu Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, 34846 Kartal, Istanbul, Turkey.

ABSTRACT

The outcomes of 3 different methods of repair of left ventricular pseudoaneurysm after myocardial infarction were analyzed retrospectively. The operations were carried out in 22 patients between 1985 and 2008. Repair procedures included primary closure with Teflon-pledgeted sutures, and Dacron or pericardial patches. Overall hospital mortality was 27.3% (2 patients had primary closure, 3 had a Dacron patch, and 1 had a pericardial patch). Mean postoperative bleeding was 885 mL (range, 200–4,800 mL). Mean preoperative and postoperative ejection fractions were 40% (30%–47%) and 48% (30%–65%), respectively. The overall incidence of arrhythmia was 36.4% (8 patients). The incidence of arrhythmia was lowest in the pericardial patch group, but this was not statistically significant. No significant differences in postoperative ejection fraction or hemorrhage were found among the study groups. Mean survival was 61.9 ±41.4 months in the 16 hospital survivors. Although the 3 techniques gave similar results, repair with an autologous pericardial patch may offer an advantage in terms of less postoperative arrhythmias.

Key Words: Aneurysm • False • Cardiac Surgical Procedures • Heart Rupture • Post-Infarction • Myocardial Infarction

INTRODUCTION

Pseudoaneurysm of the left ventricle (LV) usually develops following ventricular rupture due to transmural myocardial infarction (MI).1 In addition, it may be associated with mitral valve replacement, previous unsuccessful ventriculotomy, trauma, inflammation, tumor invasion, and apical venting.25 LV rupture after transmural MI advances from the endocardium to the pericardium. The incidence of LV free wall rupture following MI is 2%.6 Free wall rupture causes fatal pericardial tamponade in most cases, but in some, the thrombus becomes organized within the limitation of the surrounding tissues and pericardium, and becomes a cavity that results in pseudoaneurysm formation.7 Although David and colleagues8 reported that the probability of rupture is higher in lateral wall infarctions, pseudoaneurysms are also frequently encountered in the inferior and posterobasal walls. Because of the high risk of rupture, treatment of LV pseudoaneurysms should be surgical. However, surgical repair of chronic lesions still carries a high risk of mortality. Primary repair with Teflon-pledgeted sutures or secondary closure using synthetic (Teflon or Dacron) patches are the preferred surgical repair procedures.1,9,10 In this study, we also used glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium to repair LV pseudoaneurysms in 6 appropriate patients. The aim of this retrospective review was to analyze the results of LV pseudoaneurysm repair by the 3 different techniques.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 1985 and September 2008, 22 patients were operated on for LV pseudoaneurysm at Kosuyolu Heart and Research Hospital in Istanbul. The study was approved by the local ethical committee, and consent was obtained from all patients. We did not included true LV aneurysms in this study. All of these pseudoaneurysms were a consequence of transmural MI. Those identified within the first 2 weeks after MI were deemed early pseudoaneurysms. Table 1Go shows the clinical features of the patients and the surgical techniques. Of the 22 patients included in this study, 17 were male, and the mean age was 64.0 ±8.7 years. Pseudoaneurysm diameter was estimated by transthoracic echocardiography in 16 patients, by contrast left ventriculography in 3, and intraoperatively in 3. The mean pseudoaneurysm diameter was 5.0 ±0.4 cm. The time from MI to diagnosis was 68.5 ±50.7 days (range, 3–158 days; 86.4 ±43.2 days in the late presenting group, and 7.4 ±3.4 days in the early presenting group). Four acute pseudoaneurysms were found incidentally at echocardiography after MI, and 16 were diagnosed during investigation for cardiac symptoms of heart failure, arrhythmias, and stable angina pectoris. The preoperative mean LV ejection fraction was 40%. Preoperative coronary angiography was performed in all patients. There was 3-vessel disease in 15 patients, 2-vessel in 5, and 1-vessel in 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Clinical features, outcome, and surgical techniques of pseudoaneurysm repair
 
Cardiopulmonary bypass was used for repair in all cases. Cardioplegic arrest was instituted using intermittent antegrade crystalloid solution (1985–1993) or continuous retrograde blood cardioplegia (1993–2008). Mitral regurgitation was noted in 3 patients, and mitral reconstruction was performed in 2 of them. Coronary artery bypass grafting was undertaken in patients with accompanying coronary disease (mean number of distal anastomoses, 2.1). Complete dissection of the heart was carried out after crossclamping the aorta to avoid systemic embolization. Techniques for LV pseudoa-neurysm repair included primary suture closure with Teflon felt reinforcement of the sutures in 9 cases, a Dacron patch in 7, and an autologous pericardial patch in 6. Because the myocardial tissue was fragile, an autologous pericardial patch was used in 4 cases of chronic pseudoaneurysm and 2 of acute pseudoaneurysm. The pericardial patches were toughened with 1/10 diluted glutaraldehyde after resection, and shaped to close the ruptured area; the remaining pieces of pericardium were used as pledgets (Figures 1Go and 2Go). An echocardiogram on the 1st postoperative day in a patient who received a pericardial patch is shown in Figure 3Go. Follow-up information was obtained from all 16 discharged patients in November 2008, by telephone in 4 and during hospital visits in 12. Postoperative hemorrhage, ejection fraction, and incidence of ventricular arrhythmia were compared between the autologous pericardial patch group and the other 2 groups.


Figure 1
View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Ventricular pseudoaneurysm repair using an autologous pericardial patch.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Completion of the ventricular pseudoaneurysm repair using an autologous pericardial patch.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Echocardiography on the 1st postoperative day in a patient who received a pericardial patch.

 
Continuous data are expressed as mean ±standard deviation and categorical variables as percentages. The SPSS statistical software package for Windows version 15.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis. Student’s t test for paired samples was used for variables with a normal distribution. The independent samples t test, chi-squared test, Pearson correlation, and linear regression analysis were carried out. Statistical analysis was conducted with Fisher’s exact test and the Kruskall-Wallis test. A value of p <0.05 was considered statistically significant

RESULTS

Overall early postoperative mortality was 27.3%. Hospital deaths occurred in 2/9 (22.2%) patients in the primary closure group, 3/7 (42.9%) in the Dacron patch group, and 1/6 (16.7%) in the pericardial patch group (Table 1Go). Two of these 6 deaths were after repair of acute pseudoaneurysms and 4 after repair of chronic pseudoaneurysms; 3 deaths were caused by low cardiac output syndrome leading to multiple organ failure, 1 was due to pneumonia on postoperative day 17, one occurred after peptic ulcer perforation on postoperative day 17, and one was related to a neurological event on postoperative day 18 (Table 1Go). During follow-up of the surviving patients, one died due to stomach cancer. The hospital survivors exhibited considerable improvements in their general capacity during the follow-up period (New York Heart Association class I/II) compared to their preoperative state. Mean survival was 61.9 ±41.4 months in all discharged patients. Mean survival was 84±41.7 months in the primary closure group, 80 ±45.3 months in the Dacron patch group, and 32.5 ±30.3 months in the autologous pericardial patch group. Table 2Go summarizes variables related to the surgical repair techniques. No significant differences were found among the 3 groups of patients in terms of postoperative bleeding and ejection fraction. The overall incidence of arrhythmias was 36.4%: they were detected in 5/9 (55.6%) patients in the primary closure group, 2/7 (28.6%) in the Dacron patch group, and 1/6 (16.7%) in the autologous pericardial patch group; however, this difference was not significant (p = 0.183), probably due to the small sample size.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Comparison of pre- and postoperative data
 
DISCUSSION

Ventricular rupture following transmural MI is responsible for 8% of deaths caused by infarction.10 Rupture is unpredictable and can occur at any time.10 Some believe that the risk of rupture is similar regardless of whether the pseudoaneurysm is large or small.11 Because of its rarity, the natural history of LV pseudoaneurysm is unknown. Although ventricular pseudoaneurysms are reported to be frequently localized to the inferobasal and posterobasal segments of the LV (and rarely, apical segments), involvement of the inferior wall of the right ventricle and the lateral wall of the LV have also been reported as unusual cases.1215 David and colleagues8 suggested that lateral wall infarctions are more likely to rupture compared to those located on the anterior and inferior walls. In our study, 17 of the 22 patients had inferior and posterobasal lesions. LV pseudoaneurysms are mostly asymptomatic and may be detected by echocardiography during post-infarction follow-up or investigations for congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, embolism, or angina. Pseudoaneurysms can be diagnosed preoperatively by echocardiography, computed tomography, ventriculography, color-flow echocardiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.3,4 Currently, echocardiography (transthoracic or transesophageal) is the diagnostic standard.10 Intraoperative diagnosis is possible on inspection during coronary artery bypass grafting. In our cases, preoperative diagnoses were established by echocardiography or ventriculography, and 3 were found incidentally during coronary artery bypass grafting.

The general consensus is that surgery is indicated for all patients as soon as the diagnosis is established, unless the surgical risk is prohibitive. If a pseudoaneurysm is diagnosed within 2 to 3 months after MI, emergency surgery should be performed because of the high risk of rupture. If the diagnosis is made years after MI, the necessity and urgency of surgery depends on the symptoms.1 Small chronic pseudoaneurysms diagnosed incidentally seem to have a more stable course. Pretre and colleagues9 suggested that chronic asymptomatic pseudoaneurysms < 3 cm in diameter and without evidence of expansion could be treated conservatively. Moreno and colleagues16 reported 1-year survival of 90% and 4-year survival of 74% in 10 patients treated conservatively; only one patient died from cardiac causes, but 3 suffered ischemic stroke during this period. In another series, the 2-year mortality was reported to be 50% in patients with chronic LV pseudoaneurysms monitored without intervention.17 As an alternative to conservative monitoring, advances in technology now allow the option of percutaneous closure of pseudoaneurysms.17

Before opening the sternum, it may preferable to cannulate the femoral vessels, establish cardiopulmonary bypass, and institute hypothermic circulatory arrest. We did not perform femoral cannulation, but rather used ascending aorta and double-venous or 2-stage venous cannulation. In patients with preoperatively diagnosed pseudoaneurysms, the heart should be gently dissected subsequent to cannulation, and aortic crossclamping should be performed to prevent preoperative thromboembolism and rupture. Various techniques have been used to obliterate the neck of the pseudoaneurysm. The choice of the technique is based on the extent of the defect and the status of the myocardium. Fibrotic margins, which can be found in the neck of aneurysms, may aid direct closure in chronic cases. In our study, primary closure was performed in 9/22 patients.

Unfortunately, primary repair carries a higher risk of arrhythmias because pressure is exerted on the LV. Patch closure of necrotic myocardial tissue is more effective than primary closure in acute cases and large LV pseudoaneurysms. The materials used for these patches include synthetic substances such as Dacron, bovine pericardium, and autologous pericardium.1,10,12 Pericardium is an excellent material for surgical repair of certain acquired defects, including all parts of the LV outflow tract. Pericardium has also been used to repair the LV in patients with post-infarction ventricular septal defect. Atik and colleagues10 described fresh pericardial patch closure for repair of 3 LV pseudoaneurysms, and 2 such cases were reported by Daglar and colleagues.18 Our intentions in using glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardial patches were to decrease the risk of infection by avoiding synthetic material, to provide a more appropriate configuration with biological tissue, and to make the procedure more cost-effective. No significant differences were found between cases treated with pericardial patches and those with Dacron patches or primary closure, but a tendency for fewer postoperative arrhythmias was noted in the autologous pericardial patch group. The mean survival time was lower in the autologous pericardial patch group, most likely because such patches have only been used in the last 10 years.

Study limitations include the small sample size, which was not sufficient to reach a meaningful statistical conclusion. However, LV pseudoaneurysm in 22 patients is a large number from a single institution, due to the rarity of this lesion. Furthermore, these patients were operated on over a period of almost 25 years during which there have been many changes in medication, anesthesia, extracorporeal circulation management, anticoagulation and antiaggregation therapy.

Although LV pseudoaneurysms are infrequent, there is a high risk of death when conservative monitoring is used. Pseudoaneurysms can be repaired surgically, with acceptable mortality, until a more appropriate method becomes available.

REFERENCES

  1. Eren E, Bozbuga N, Toker ME, Keles C, Rabus MB, Yildirim O, et al. Surgical treatment of post-infarction left ventricular pseudoaneurysm: a two-decade experience. Tex Heart Inst J 2007;34:47–51.[Medline]

  2. Choi JB, Choi SH, Oh SK, Kim NH. Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm after coronary artery bypasses and valve replacement for post-infarction mitral regurgitation. Tex Heart Inst J 2006;33:505–7.[Medline]

  3. Sutherland GR, Smyllie JH, Roelandt JR. Advantages of colour flow imaging in the diagnosis of left ventricular pseudoaneurysm. Br Heart J 1989;61:59–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Lee PJ, Spencer KT. Pseudoaneurysm of the left ventricular free wall caused by tumor infiltration. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999;12:604–6.[Medline]

  5. Kao CL, Chang JP. Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm secondary to left ventricular apical venting. Tex Heart Inst J 2003;30:162–3.[Medline]

  6. Moreno R, Lopez de Sa E, Lopez-Sendon JL, Garcia E, Soriano J, Abeytua M, et al. Frequency of left ventricular free-wall rupture in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:757–60, A8.[Medline]

  7. Malcolm ID, Fitchett DH, Stewart D, Marpole D, Symes J. Ventricular aneurysm: false or true? An important distinction. Ann Thorac Surg 1980;29:474–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  8. David TE. Surgery for postinfarction rupture of the free wall of the ventricle. In: David TE, editor. Mechanical complications of myocardial infarction. RG Landes, Austin, 1993:142–51.

  9. Pretre R, Linka A, Jenni R, Turina MI. Surgical treatment of acquired left ventricular pseudoaneurysms. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:553–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  10. Atik FA, Navia JL, Vega PR, Gonzalez-Stawinski GV, Alster JM, Gillinov AM, et al. Surgical treatment of postinfarction left ventricular pseudoaneurysm. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83: 526–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  11. Vlodaver Z, Coe JI, Edwards JE. True and false left ventricular aneurysms. Propensity for the latter to rupture. Circulation 1975;51:567–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  12. Reddy SG, Roberts WC. Frequency of rupture of the left ventricular free wall or ventricular septum among necropsy cases of fatal acute myocardial infarction since introduction of coronary care units. Am J Cardiol 1989;63:906–11.[Medline]

  13. Csapo K, Voith L, Szuk T, Edes I, Kereiakes DJ. Postinfarction left ventricular pseudoaneurysm. Clin Cardiol 1997;20:898–903.[Medline]

  14. Nurozler F, Kutlu T, Kucuk G. False aneurysm of the left ventricle following myocardial infarction: an unusual location. Cardiovasc J Afr 2007;18:380–2.[Medline]

  15. Moreno R, Gordillo E, Zamorano J, Almeria C, Garcia-Rubira JC, Fernandez-Ortiz A, et al. Long term outcome of patients with postinfarction left ventricular pseudoaneurysm. Heart 2003;89:1144–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  16. Van Tassel RA, Edwards JE. Rupture of heart complicating myocardial infarction. Analysis of 40 cases including nine examples of left ventricular false aneurysm. Chest 1972;61:104–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  17. Clift P, Thorne S, de Giovanni J. Percutaneous device closure of pseudoaneurysm of the left ventricular wall. Heart 2004;90:e62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  18. Daglar B, Celkan MA, Kazaz H, Ustunsoy H, Davutoglu V. Surgical treatment of postinfarction left ventricular pseudo-aneurysm. J Card Surg 2004;19:544–6.[Medline]

Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2010; 18:39-43
© 2010 by SAGE Publications
DOI: 10.1177/0218492309353988




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ali Fedakar
Ilker Mataraci
Ercan Eren
Rahmi Zeybek
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fedakar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zeybek, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fedakar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zeybek, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS